W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2009

RE: New work on fonts at W3C

From: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:15:17 -0400
Message-ID: <E955AA200CF46842B46F49B0BBB83FF2924CC4@wil-email-01.agfamonotype.org>
To: "Mikko Rantalainen" <mikko.rantalainen@peda.net>, <www-style@w3.org>
On Monday, June 22, 2009 6:44 AM Mikko Rantalainen wrote:
> There's one major difference between OpenType and TrueType patents and
> EOT: the browser is expected to "decrypt" (unscramble) the font file
> (possibly needing the patent license) but OpenType and TrueType fonts
> are used by the operating system. The browser vendors do not have
> problem with those patents.
> In addition, the patent(s) on EOT is meant to be used as "security"
> feature preventing the "decryption" of font.

How can a royalty-free, unrestricted patent license for font compression (that is part of the publicly available specification) be "meant to be used as "security" feature preventing the "decryption" of font"?


> --
> Mikko

Received on Monday, 22 June 2009 19:15:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:37 UTC