- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:02:15 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
We added a 'content-box' value to 'background-clip' to make it parallel with 'background-origin', since in the 'background' shorthand the 'border-box' and 'padding-box' will set both. But I can't imagine any use for it. I can see wanting to position images relative to the content box. But I can't see wanting to clip background images to the content box. Should this value be removed? That would mean background: url(image.src) top left content-box; will place an image in the top left corner of the content box, but clip to the border-box (background-clip's default). It could be useful for something like background: url(flower.src) -10px -10px content-box no-repeat; /* Place a flower over the top right corner of the first letter */ I can imagine a lot more reasons to want to position to the content box and clip to the border box than wanting to clip to the content box. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 26 January 2009 20:02:55 UTC