- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:54:28 -0800
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Jan 9, 2009, at 4:27 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > On Friday 2009-01-09 16:20 -0800, Brad Kemper wrote: >> # Specifies an image to use instead of the borders created by the >> ‘border-style’, 'border-width', 'border-color', 'border-radius', and > > border-width does matter some of the time. > >> 'box-shadow' properties and an additional background image for the >> element. Unless the value is ‘none’ or if the image cannot be >> displayed, >> the element will be displayed as if border-style and 'box-shadow' had >> value of 'none' and 'border-radius' had a value of 0, and only >> 'border-image' will be used to generate any border, curved corner, >> or box >> shadow effects. > > If the border-image had the curve built in, wouldn't you want the > border-radius to continue to apply to the background? Yes, you are right. I've played with the effect a little more now, and did some testing, and agree that the background (and foreground) should still be clipped by the curves of the border-radius. But border- image should remain unaffected, because border-image is there to create a different border than what border-radius applies to. And box- shadow should also be hidden by border-image, for the same reason (because border-image is there to create a different border than what box-shadow applies to).
Received on Friday, 16 January 2009 17:55:05 UTC