- From: Thomas Phinney <thomas.phinney@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:30:25 -0800
- To: "Dave Singer" <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: "Josef Schmid" <e9427749@student.tuwien.ac.at>, www-style@w3.org
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Dave Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > At 11:34 -0800 9/01/09, Thomas Phinney wrote: >> >> FWIW, in most (though by no means all) fonts, the digits are >> monospaced, even if the font is not. >> >> That being said, I agree that knowing the width of the zero alone, >> without knowing for sure that the digits are monospaced, would seem to >> be of limited value. >> >> Regards, >> >> T > > > off the top of my head > > > perhaps it should be defined to be "the monospaced digit width, if there are > both digits and they are monospaced, else 0"? Makes sense to me. T
Received on Monday, 12 January 2009 19:39:07 UTC