- From: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:17:11 -0600
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
I think border-radius should clip the border-image, just as it clips the background. In many cases I believe the border-radius should clip the foreground too. Border-image alone is not able to dictate this clipping behavior, so a designer *is* going to need to set both in order to clip the background and foreground content, regardless of fallback intentions. I think it's inconsistent that this clip effect, which we'd like to apply to the whole box in the case of content like images, would "turn off" just for a single piece of the box (a specified border image). I don't think the fallback use case is particularly interesting or relevant here. dave (hyatt@apple.com) On Jan 9, 2009, at 6:27 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > > On Friday 2009-01-09 16:20 -0800, Brad Kemper wrote: >> # Specifies an image to use instead of the borders created by the >> ‘border-style’, 'border-width', 'border-color', 'border-radius', and > > border-width does matter some of the time. > >> 'box-shadow' properties and an additional background image for the >> element. Unless the value is ‘none’ or if the image cannot be >> displayed, >> the element will be displayed as if border-style and 'box-shadow' had >> value of 'none' and 'border-radius' had a value of 0, and only >> 'border-image' will be used to generate any border, curved corner, >> or box >> shadow effects. > > If the border-image had the curve built in, wouldn't you want the > border-radius to continue to apply to the background? > > -David > > -- > L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ > Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/ >
Received on Saturday, 10 January 2009 20:30:52 UTC