- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:43:15 +0100
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:33:38 +0100, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > The spec says that if one property doesn't have enough values > in its comma-separated list, then its list is repeated until > it does. E.g. > > background-image: url(image1.gif), url(image2.gif), url(image3.gif); > background-repeat: no-repeat, repeat-x; > > is equivalent to > > background-image: url(image1.gif), url(image2.gif), url(image3.gif); > background-repeat: no-repeat, repeat-x, no-repeat; > > Question: does this happen to the computed value or the used value? > I.e. does the extended value get inherited or the non-extended value? > I'm leaning towards making this a used-value stage adjustment. We (Opera) think inheriting the non-extended value makes the most sense and it's what we've been planning to implement down the line. I.e. we agree with you. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 9 January 2009 14:44:12 UTC