- From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:19:08 +0100
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
fantasai wrote: > The problem with changing names of properties at this late stage is > that people are already using the existing names in their style sheets. > This module is so well advanced implementation-wise that you see things > like > -webkit-border-radius > -moz-border-radius > border-radius > in tutorials etc. Part of me feels sad that this is a concern (in general, not specific to this borders topic); isn't a significant aim of having vendor prefixes that we do /not/ get locked into certain property names, value names or value behaviour until the spec is reasonably mature, eg past Working Draft? I suppose it's a numbers game though, and perhaps value consistency is a more powerful motivation than property name change for avoiding lock-in. Incidentally, which UAs support the un-prefixed "border-radius"? Cheers, Anton Prowse http://dev.moonhenge.net
Received on Monday, 9 February 2009 22:20:00 UTC