- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:02:36 -0800
- To: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- CC: Simon Montagu <smontagu@smontagu.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, 'Richard Ishida' <ishida@w3.org>
Aryeh Gregor wrote: > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Simon Montagu <smontagu@smontagu.org> wrote: >> When I wrote http://www.smontagu.org/writings/HebrewNumbers.html I was >> trying to present as many alternatives as possible without being too >> prescriptive. My personal opinion today is: >> >> 1) The Hebrew numbering system should be treated as defined in the range 1 - >> 999999 >> 2) The system should only use letters with numerical values and not mix in >> words for "zero" or "thousands". >> >> Suggested text for the algorithm: >> ... > > I've attached a diff (or tried to) that implements this, including > updating the examples. Checked in: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-lists/#hebrew Simon, Richard, can you review, please? > There's still one outstanding issue: that an extra ׳/״ is added if the > numbers are in content, but not otherwise. This remains commented > out. Perhaps a second, almost identical numbering system could be > defined (hebrew-content? hebrew-inline?) that uses this, if we want to > be typographically correct. Then users could specify this second > numbering type if using the number inside text. If this is adequate for list numbers, then we're good. Other forms of generated content can easily combine counters with arbitrary strings. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 9 February 2009 23:08:31 UTC