W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Gradient syntax proposal

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:32:29 -0700
Message-Id: <1C89E19D-C798-4849-954E-64FA9CEFBD76@gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Aug 17, 2009, at 11:07 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>  

> Brad Kemper wrote:
>> On Aug 15, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>>> What I am against is adding complexity and confusion to the  
>>>> grammar just to
>>>> serve some extreme edge cases.
>>> It only adds complexity when you want it.  In the simple, common  
>>> cases
>>> it has no effect at all.
>> It adds unnecessary complexity to the grammar. That's a bad thing.
> It is, in fact, simpler to re-use existing syntactic constructs

Simpler for who? Implementors? I'm talking about simpler to read,  
understand, etc.

A single key word is simpler to parse mentally than five, or than a  
string of measurements that are based on a completely different  
coordinate system than the color-stop measurements that need to be in  
the grammar anyway. 
Received on Monday, 17 August 2009 20:33:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:38 UTC