Re: Gradient syntax proposal

On Aug 17, 2009, at 11:12 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>  
wrote:

>> I'm talking about a situation like:
>> linear-gradient(top to top / green, blue)
>> If something analogous was expressed in SVG, it would just be a big
>> blue image, since blue was the furthest color stop.  Right now in my
>> proposal it's invalid.
>
> Makes sense to me, because you can't derive an angle from that.
> The transition would take zero distance but without a definite
> angle, there are infinite gradients that fit that description.

If you get rid of the unneccesary bg-position and 'to' part, and just  
have a single keyword, then this odd situation does not arrise.

Received on Monday, 17 August 2009 20:36:41 UTC