- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:00:07 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > (Not quite true, actually - now that I've allowed lengths in > color-stops, it's possible for you to use "in" on one stop, "px" on > another, and "em" on a third, thus producing an ordering that can vary > wildly based on pixel size and text size. At that point you're really > digging your own grave, though - you can screw up your design in a > million different ways by mixing different classes of lengths, and I > don't feel it important to protect you from doing so in this one > circumstance. You still can't mix lengths and %, though, which would > be the primary cause of order-switching, so I'm content.) I would prefer restricting stops to percentages. The swapping effect is confusing, and I don't see any reason you'd /need/ to use lengths when you can specify the length of the overall gradient already. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 17 August 2009 18:00:57 UTC