On Aug 13, 2009, at 3:15 PM, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Brad Kemper > <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think that is what he meant, and it is not what I mean. He > was talking in favor of functional notation within the value of his > gradient property. I don't see any of what we've been mostly talking > about as being a difference between me saying gradient should be a > separate property (which is what Mozilla already has) > > No, we currently use -moz-linear-gradient() and -moz-radial-gradient > () as an image type, i.e., in place of url(). And that is what I want. Understood. But that's a separate discussion from the one about color stop syntax, and the opposite of what Tad said he shred with you on.
Received on Thursday, 13 August 2009 23:10:18 UTC