- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:21:40 +0200
- To: "Bert Bos" <bert@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:10:51 +0200, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org> wrote: > As an aside (because it's about HTML, not CSS): > > If that's what HTML5 will say about them, then that's bad. :-( > > Currently they are in error, which I like much better. The most obvious > reading for media="" is that the link applies to no media at all. And > thus, if lines like this start appearing in HTML, many people will > wonder if the author made a mistake. It's better to keep empty values > illegal. I think HTML 4 is not clear either way on the matter. Making it non-conforming but requiring it to be treated as if all was specified seems fine though. I can probably get that in HTML 5 if we agree that's a good idea. > (If HTML changes this, there will be an inconsistency between HTML and > XML, unless http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-stylesheet is also changed. It > will be difficult to find out what breaks in that case.) The XML Core WG is working on updating that document. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2009 15:22:24 UTC