RE: [page][gcpm] should a named page start on a new page?

fantasai said:
> Håkon Wium Lie wrote:
> I think there are two simpler option
> > that preserves the behavior from CSS2:
> >
> > 1) We can say that foo:first doens't create a page break,
> but if there
> > is an explicit page break there alsory, foo:first will apply.
> >
> > 2) We remove foo:first altogether and use page lists instead.
>
> I have a preference for #1.

+1

Best wishes,

Melinda

Received on Monday, 15 September 2008 17:55:54 UTC