W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2008

Re: [page][gcpm] should a named page start on a new page?

From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:23:52 +0200
Message-ID: <18640.12792.343181.841924@opera.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: (wrong string) åkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, "Grant, Melinda" <melinda.grant@hp.com>, www-style@w3.org

Also sprach fantasai:

 > > I understand your resistance. I think there are two simpler option
 > > that preserves the behavior from CSS2:
 > > 
 > > 1) We can say that foo:first doesn't create a page break, but if there
 > > is an explicit page break there already, foo:first will apply.

 > I have a preference for #1.

I've edited GCPM to reflect this behavior:


It seems, however, that the description of :first should go here?:


              Håkon Wium Lie                          CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2008 22:25:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:39 UTC