- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:58:24 -0700
- To: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- CC: "Grant, Melinda" <melinda.grant@hp.com>, www-style@w3.org
Håkon Wium Lie wrote: > > The solution is neat, but I don't like the overloading; the presence > of a pseudo-class style rule should not add page breaks. Agreed. > I understand your resistance. I think there are two simpler option > that preserves the behavior from CSS2: > > 1) We can say that foo:first doens't create a page break, but if there > is an explicit page break there alsory, foo:first will apply. > > 2) We remove foo:first altogether and use page lists instead. I have a preference for #1. My concern with 'page-group' is that it's a mode-switching property, which is something we should avoid for cascading reasons if possible. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 12 September 2008 17:59:10 UTC