- From: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:00:27 -0500
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
On Sep 4, 2008, at 3:52 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > > Right now the syntax of the transform-origin property in > http://webkit.org/specs/CSSVisualEffects/CSSTransforms.html is > similar to the syntax of the existing 'background-position' property > (plus an extra length at the end for anybody implementing 3-D > transforms). It actually looks like it pretty much matches the CSS > 2.0 definition of background-position, but not the CSS 2.1 > definition, which allows mixing of percentages/lengths with keywords > to match implementations. > > I propose eliminating all differences with the background-position > property and just matching the CSS 2.1 definition of the > background-position property, plus (for those implementing 3-D > transforms) an optional third length at the end when the first two > values are percentages or lengths. > That sounds good to me. > (There are also recently-agreed changes for css3-background; those > might make things a little trickier.) > Could you elaborate? dave (hyatt@apple.com)
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2008 21:01:10 UTC