- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:31:02 -0700
- To: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- CC: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style@w3.org, Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
David Hyatt wrote: > > On Sep 4, 2008, at 3:52 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > >> >> Right now the syntax of the transform-origin property in >> http://webkit.org/specs/CSSVisualEffects/CSSTransforms.html is >> similar to the syntax of the existing 'background-position' property >> (plus an extra length at the end for anybody implementing 3-D >> transforms). It actually looks like it pretty much matches the CSS >> 2.0 definition of background-position, but not the CSS 2.1 >> definition, which allows mixing of percentages/lengths with keywords >> to match implementations. >> >> I propose eliminating all differences with the background-position >> property and just matching the CSS 2.1 definition of the >> background-position property, plus (for those implementing 3-D >> transforms) an optional third length at the end when the first two >> values are percentages or lengths. > > That sounds good to me. > >> (There are also recently-agreed changes for css3-background; those >> might make things a little trickier.) > > Could you elaborate? The change is to allow positioning from corners other than the top left by extending the syntax of background-position so that each keyword in the 2-keyword notation can be followed by an offset: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#the-background-position ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 6 September 2008 03:31:49 UTC