- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:52:42 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Cc: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
Right now the syntax of the transform-origin property in http://webkit.org/specs/CSSVisualEffects/CSSTransforms.html is similar to the syntax of the existing 'background-position' property (plus an extra length at the end for anybody implementing 3-D transforms). It actually looks like it pretty much matches the CSS 2.0 definition of background-position, but not the CSS 2.1 definition, which allows mixing of percentages/lengths with keywords to match implementations. I propose eliminating all differences with the background-position property and just matching the CSS 2.1 definition of the background-position property, plus (for those implementing 3-D transforms) an optional third length at the end when the first two values are percentages or lengths. (There are also recently-agreed changes for css3-background; those might make things a little trickier.) -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2008 20:53:22 UTC