- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:30:05 -0700
- To: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Yes, rectangular - although it has to be defined what happens when two or more first off-regions intersect (e.g. when width of left border is greater than width of first on-region of top border)
-----Original Message-----
From: Håkon Wium Lie [mailto:howcome@opera.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 1:53 PM
To: Alex Mogilevsky
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Subject: RE: [gcpm] border-parts
Also sprach Alex Mogilevsky:
> One more thing... I think we talked about defining the parts
> literally as clip region that erases portions of the border. The
> advantage of using that definition is that it tells UA precisely
> what is expected, especially in complex cases like elliptic
> corners, insets, etc. However if there is a more intelligent way of
> handling it, that definition would not allow it... I think it is
> still worth mentioning as suggested implementation.
These clip regions would be rectangular, right?
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Thursday, 30 October 2008 21:30:53 UTC