- From: Brad Kemper <brkemper.comcast@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:39:33 -0700
- To: Jordan Osete <jor@joozt.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
No sweat. It's not my baby; I just didn't know what you were revering to. AFAIK, none of the implementations have multishadow support for text shadow. Anyway, I agree with you about your other points. I believe they are working out the details for spread on box-shadow first (it is a relatively recent addition there), but I expect (or at least hope) to see it moved into text-shadow after that. As for foreground color, I think WebKit might support that already (with a prefix). I agree it would be useful if it was supported by all who support shadows. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 27, 2008, at 1:07 PM, Jordan Osete <jor@joozt.net> wrote: > > Sorry, I was thinking about the fact that the current version of > Safari only supports one shadow, > but as you say, it's not relevant here. > Even if only one shadow is used by the user-agent, both spread > radius and foreground color can still be implemented to text-shadow, > so please consider the proposal as if I did not talk about Safari in > that harsh way, it wasn't my intention. > > Regards, > Jordan Osete > > Brad Kemper a ¨¦crit : >> >> >> On Oct 25, 2008, at 3:18 AM, Jordan Osete wrote: >> >>> Seeing that text-shadow will ship in the next version of FF, and >>> Opera (and, to a lesser extent, Safari) already support it >> >> In what way is Safari's support for text-shadow "to a lesser extent"? >> >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2008 00:40:18 UTC