- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:33:04 +0200
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
L. David Baron wrote: > # When a=1, or a=-1, the number may be omitted from the rule. > > This makes it sound like when a=-1, the "-1" can be omitted, whereas > really only the "1" can be omitted, and the "-" is still required. > It should also perhaps be clear than the optional "+" sign before a > positive 1 need not be omitted even if the number is, so that > :nth-child(+n+6) is valid. AHHHHH!!!!! I did tell Elika about that one when we edited the spec together an hour ago :-) Hey, the old monkey is sometimes right ;-) </Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2008 14:33:43 UTC