- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:31:24 -0400
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thursday 2008-10-16 15:55 +0200, Daniel Glazman wrote: > The new spec is available at http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors3/ > The diff is available at http://tinyurl.com/selectors3-diff20081016 These changes look good, with two minor exceptions: (1) # When a=1, or a=-1, the number may be omitted from the rule. This makes it sound like when a=-1, the "-1" can be omitted, whereas really only the "1" can be omitted, and the "-" is still required. It should also perhaps be clear than the optional "+" sign before a positive 1 need not be omitted even if the number is, so that :nth-child(+n+6) is valid. (I sort of raised this before in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0083.html although I missed the issue about the "+n" case.) (2) The document uses the term "expanded element name" without defining it. It probably ought to define it somewhere, perhaps by reference to the term "expanded name" in http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names/ . -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2008 14:32:02 UTC