- From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:09:01 +0100
- To: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > :has-child - element has single child. > :has-children - element has at least one child. > E:has-child-of-type(T) - matches element that has precisely one > immediate child of type T. > E:has-children-of-type(T) - matches element that has one or more > immediate children of type T. Slightly worried about the ambiguity of these names -- if I have one or more children, then I "have child". if I have more than one child, then I "have children". You seem to be using these with the reverse semantics. Philip TAYLOR
Received on Thursday, 9 October 2008 18:09:39 UTC