- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 22:14:15 -0700
- To: Brad Kemper <brkemper@comcast.net>
- CC: Eli Morris-Heft <dai@doublefishstudios.com>, www-style@w3.org
Brad Kemper wrote: > > On May 6, 2008, at 3:55 PM, Eli Morris-Heft wrote: > >> The current syntax (as seen >> at http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#the-box-shadow) > > Another thing about this syntax is that negative numbers are allowed for > the first two lengths (horizontal and vertical offsets), but no mention > is made about negative values for the third (blur radius). Perhaps it is > assumed that a negative length would make no sense there, and so is not > worth mentioning, but I would propose that it should allow a negative > number. Then a negative blur radius could mean that is is an inner > shadow instead of an outer shadow. > > Inner shadows are useful for creating the effect of a hole cut in the > background, instead of something floating above the background. Apple > uses this effect a lot in Mac OS X in their system preferences panels, > and other places where there are tab panels. The shadow is on the inside > of the box instead of the outside. > > I would like to be able to create that effect with box box-shadow and > text-shadow. Hi Brad, I can understand the idea of an inner "glow" analogous to the outer "glow" you can get by using zero offsets and a positive blur radius. But I'm having trouble understanding what an inner "shadow" (with non-zero offsets) would be. Can you explain and maybe post some examples? Thanks~ ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 10 May 2008 05:14:59 UTC