[css3-namespace] General and editorial comments

Dear CSS WG,

This is a last call comment from the SVG WG on the CSS Namespaces Module,  
W3C Working Draft 15 February 2008,  
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-css3-namespace-20080215/. Please let us know  
if you have any questions by CC:ing your responses to www-svg@w3.org.

My sincere apologies for the review being sent a few days late.

Its good to see this small but vital syntactic addition (agreed in
1998) at last moving towards completion. The draft is in general good
and the comments from the SVG WG are mostly minor issues of clarification.

The numbering of the examples is a bit odd at first glance. The first
example in the spec is "example IV", which is followed by "example VI".
There seem to be a few examples in between (judging by the html source),
but they don't show a number. Is that intentional?

We have a few more specific comments, to make it easier to follow and  
respond to we have split them into individual emails by section.

Regards
/Erik, on behalf of the SVG WG

-- 
Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software
Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed

Received on Monday, 10 March 2008 15:57:58 UTC