- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:35:20 +0200
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, "Grant, Melinda" <melinda.grant@hp.com>
On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 21:21:56 +0200, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > I would like to see Melinda's proposed wording used to define > (device-)width/height, as I believe the current wording is wrong and does > not match the sentences defining how it maps to paged and continuous > media. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jun/0009.html [end] Ok, changed. On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 21:20:06 +0200, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > Actually, I think the device-width/height should refer to the page sheet > size, not the page box. That's more analogous to the screen size, since > it's the physical medium size. (The page box could be smaller than the > page > sheet, just like the viewport is smaller than the screen size.) > > That's the conclusion we reached in Medford, anyway. Changed. Please review: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-mediaqueries/ -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 9 June 2008 12:36:17 UTC