- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:18:09 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 21:21:56 +0200, fantasai > <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> I would like to see Melinda's proposed wording used to define >> (device-)width/height, as I believe the current wording is wrong and does >> not match the sentences defining how it maps to paged and continuous >> media. >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jun/0009.html [end] > > Ok, changed. > > On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 21:20:06 +0200, fantasai > <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> Actually, I think the device-width/height should refer to the page sheet >> size, not the page box. That's more analogous to the screen size, since >> it's the physical medium size. (The page box could be smaller than the >> page >> sheet, just like the viewport is smaller than the screen size.) >> >> That's the conclusion we reached in Medford, anyway. > > Changed. > > Please review: > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-mediaqueries/ r=fantasai on those changes ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 9 June 2008 21:18:46 UTC