- From: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:15:58 -0600
- To: "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Jan 23, 2008, at 5:03 AM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > Anyway, if browsers actually vary the meaning of normal by font, the > situation is rather odd: They do this. A value of 'normal' will use a line height that is equal to the line gap + ascent + descent, where all three of those numbers are obtained from the font itself. Hence my complaint about percentage and numeric line heights being relative to font-size. The intuitive behavior of 200% or 2 as a line-height value would have been to be twice the value of 'normal.' It's too late to change this now though. I definitely see value in introducing a new unit in order to be able to specify the line-height as a multiple of 'normal.' dave (hyatt@apple.com)
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 20:16:16 UTC