- From: Ben Cotterell <ben.cotterell@antplc.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:30:12 +0000
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 02:15:58PM -0600, David Hyatt wrote: > > > On Jan 23, 2008, at 5:03 AM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > > >Anyway, if browsers actually vary the meaning of normal by font, the > >situation is rather odd: > > They do this. A value of 'normal' will use a line height that is > equal to the line gap + ascent + descent, where all three of those > numbers are obtained from the font itself. Hence my complaint about > percentage and numeric line heights being relative to font-size. The > intuitive behavior of 200% or 2 as a line-height value would have been > to be twice the value of 'normal.' It's too late to change this now > though. > > I definitely see value in introducing a new unit in order to be able > to specify the line-height as a multiple of 'normal.' Another way to achieve that rather than with a new unit might be with a new property called "line-spacing", whose value is a number, interpreted as a multiple of normal line-height. Then you'd say line-spacing applies only to elements whose computed value of line-height is normal. -- Ben Cotterell Senior Software Engineer, ANT Software Limited
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2008 15:30:33 UTC