- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:34:56 -0800
- To: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, wai-liaison@w3.org
On Wednesday 2008-01-23 14:01 -0500, Al Gilman wrote: > however, the issue as logged with the "Resolution" being "assumed > editorial", and the post which points to the CSS 2.1 issues list Sorry, but what's the problem with this? Fixing the accessibility of the document doesn't require group consensus on the changes; it's a matter for the editor to fix. Given that it's on the issues list and there's an action for the editor to fix it, why are you complaining about it again? -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 19:35:13 UTC