- From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@narod.ru>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:56:05 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
David, >> DD> a mandatory semantic layer). >> Objection does not work against <style> at all. DD> Yes it does. The user agent downloads the HTML document, which DD> contains some CSS, but the user agent doesn't support CSS What is "doesn't support CSS": 1) doesn't use for rendering ? 2) or doesn't use to specify attribute values ? Nature of UA may be so, that it doesn't render at all - so (1) is absolutely right in this particular case. But (2) is not bound with nature of UA, so there is no any restriction to use CSS to assign values for attributes. DD> The semantics that were placed in the optional DD> presentation layer are lost. Many things are based on "presentation layer": e.g. behaviour, pronunciation. DD> We are dealing with Cascading STYLE Sheets here. Ortodox-ness. >> I'm against to enter new values for @type or @rel _for this purpose_ , >> because brain will must keep this devision without any benefit. DD> Those are other issues, which I object too as well. DD> ... though since they don't put semantics into the style layer. 1) you object against new values for @type or @rel ? Why ? 2) you object against assignment of attributes in separate file ? Why ? Dmitry Turin SQL5 (5.9.1) http://sql50.euro.ru HTML6 (6.5.1) http://html60.euro.ru Unicode7 (7.2.1) http://unicode70.euro.ru Computer2 (2.0.2) http://computer20.euro.ru
Received on Friday, 11 January 2008 08:55:05 UTC