- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:07:51 +0000
- To: CSS Style <www-style@w3.org>
> On 11 Jan 2008, at 08:11, Dmitry Turin wrote: >> Ortodox-ness. W3C is basically a standards body and standards are very much about orthodoxy! Most standards document existing orthodoxy. Those that don't specify a new orthodoxy Either way, orthodoxy is desirable for standards. In English, saying the "orthodox way of doing" has a similar, if more critical, meaning to saying "the standard way of doing". The implied criticisms is one of standards, as a whole. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Friday, 11 January 2008 09:08:34 UTC