- From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:46:46 +0100
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
> > * E:empty – Chances are indeed that authors will use element > > selectors instead, and I remember Eric raising other concerns > > concerning this pseudo-class [1]. > > Element selectors? Eric's concerns are browser bugs and a slight > misunderstanding of <img>. Please note the “and”. Me, I am talking about probably using element/type selectors instead (for example, using ”hr” instead of ”:empty” on imaginary sites where the only empty element is an “hr”); Eric had a few different thoughts. > > * E:lang(fr) – Probably the most questionable selector since > > apparently replaceable by attribute selectors. > > Oh really? I don't think so. Could you explain, please? What can you really do with ”:lang()” that is IMPOSSIBLE to do with attribute selectors (not talking about character savings)? > > * E:nth-of-type(n), E:nth-last-child(n), E:nth-last-of-type(n) – > > Trivial objection: These selectors will bring much joy but will be > > rarely used just because “cognitively too demanding”; I expect them > > to be used absolutely nowhere in personal projects and quite rarely > > in complex projects. That doesn't mean anything, it's just my two > > cents. > > I'd expect a few people to make examples on how you can put them to use > and authors to follow by copy and pasting. Probably “trivial objection” wasn't clear, it was just a simple remark that I do not expect heavy use of these selectors, which, again, must not mean anything here. Sure, I could have dropped the note entirely, but I haven't been aware that all words get weighed now. -- Jens Meiert http://meiert.com/en/
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2008 09:47:00 UTC