- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:03:22 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Thursday 2008-02-14 02:03 -0800, fantasai wrote: > Specifically, block-level elements with "visibility: collapse" should behave as > if their box was zero height with zero vertical padding, border width, and margins, > and inline-level elements with "visibility: collapse" should behave as if their > box was zero width with zero horizontal padding, border width, and margins. > Furthermore all descendants of a non-internal-table-element with "visibility: > collapse"--including descendants that are anonymous boxes--are also treated as > if they had "visibility: collapse". Is there a compelling use case for this? Do authors want it for some reason? It's a good bit of work to implement, and it's not worth doing that work just to make the property semantics more aesthetically pleasing to spec designers. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2008 11:03:46 UTC