- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:03:14 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
I'd like to raise the comments posted by Markus Jonsson and Andrew Fedoniouk about the behavior of "visibility: collapse" as a CSS2.1 issue. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Jul/0153.html Currently for internal table elements it collapses them to take up no room but to still participate in width/height calculations. The goal is to make dynamic show/hide operations smooth and efficient. This makes sense. However, for non-internal-table-elements, it's currently defined to behave as "visibility: hidden", which is not very useful. It just makes the element invisible. I think smooth and efficient dynamic collapsing behavior makes sense outside of tables as well, and that the definition should be changed to be consistent with this use case. Specifically, block-level elements with "visibility: collapse" should behave as if their box was zero height with zero vertical padding, border width, and margins, and inline-level elements with "visibility: collapse" should behave as if their box was zero width with zero horizontal padding, border width, and margins. Furthermore all descendants of a non-internal-table-element with "visibility: collapse"--including descendants that are anonymous boxes--are also treated as if they had "visibility: collapse". ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2008 10:03:19 UTC