- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 17:58:04 +0200
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
On Feb 9, 2008, at 03:20, fantasai wrote:
> I've added the following to the spec, does this make sense?
>
> | If a size property declaration specifies a page size that would
> cause that
> | declaration to not apply (e.g. a media query that qualifies it
> applies
> | only to a different paper size) then the declaration must be
> ignored.
> |
> | In the following example
> | @page {
> | size: 4in 6in;
> | }
> |
> | @media (max-width: 6in) {
> | @page {
> | size: letter;
> | }
> | }
> | The second size declaration is ignored, i.e. the specified value
> of the
> | size property is 4in 6in.
>
> It's a bit more complicated processing than we normally do for
> things that
> are "ignored"... but disallowing @page inside @media wouldn't solve
> the
> problem anyway due to media="" and @import.
To me this makes sense from the authoring point of view, but I'm not
qualified to comment on implementability in a CSS print formatter.
--
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Saturday, 9 February 2008 15:58:20 UTC