- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:22:22 +0900
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Hi Anne, Le 7 févr. 2008 à 07:13, Anne van Kesteren a écrit : > In > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0028.html > > you wondered why the url() syntax was discouraged and we replied in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Oct/0006.html > > with an explanation. However, we have since then changed our views > on the matter and both strings and url() syntax are fine now. cool. Checking the Editor's draft. http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-namespace/#syntax The syntax for the @namespace rule is as follows (using the notation from the Grammar appendix of CSS 2.1 [CSS21]): namespace : NAMESPACE_SYM S* [namespace_prefix S*]? [STRING|URI] S* ';' S* ; namespace_prefix : IDENT ; It is said: "A URI string parsed from the URI syntax must be treated as a literal string: as with the STRING syntax, no URI-specific normalization is applied." Just a question: what is a URI-specific normalization? -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2008 00:22:31 UTC