W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2006

Re: [css3-namespace] url() syntax

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 12:54:25 +1300
Message-ID: <451F03B1.2010305@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org

karl@w3.org wrote:
> About http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-css3-namespace-20060828/#syntax
> The specification goes on defining that the namespace can be expressed
> as a string or a URI with the construct [STRING|URI] then later on the
> specification seems to discouraged the use of URI construct.
> 	[[[
> 	A URI string parsed from the url() syntax must be 
> 	treated as a literal string: no URI-specific 
> 	normalization is applied. For this reason the string 
> 	syntax is recommended, and the url()  syntax discouraged 
> 	deprecated?.
> 	]]]
> Why the original syntax is not:
>   : NAMESPACE_SYM S* [namespace_prefix S*]? STRING S* ';' S*

Because support for the url() syntax has already been widely implemented,
and telling UAs not to support it would break backward compatibility. At
the same time, I feel the string syntax is a clearer representation of
how the namespace is processed (because the namespace need not be a url,
and because no url-specific processing is applied to it).

> Does the litteral string has to be a valid URI?

As far as CSS is concerned, no.

Let me know if this addresses your comment.

Received on Sunday, 1 October 2006 04:23:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:26 UTC