Re: [css3-mediaqueries] parsing

Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:00:38 +0200, Anne van Kesteren <> 
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:50:26 +0200, fantasai 
>> <> wrote:
>>> Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>>>  To match existing implementations better and also to give better 
>>>> forward compatible parsing rules maybe we should do it as follows:
>>>>  * A violation of the basic syntax will cause the list of media 
>>>> queries to be ignored.
>>> I don't agree with this. I think better forward-compatible parsing rules
>>> would be to follow the parse-strings-match-brackets rules used in CSS
>>> declaration blocks and to drop only the affected media query, not the
>>> whole list.
>> So I actually did not include any of those in my examples. If you can 
>> suggest how the specification should deal with those that would be 
>> appreciated. I don't think that has been covered in any of the older 
>> specifications.
> Per further discussion on IRC I have now updated the draft to address 
> this issue.
> Let me know if I have missed anything.

As per

   | Resolved: That the CSSWG's IRC channel shall be ... logged. ... That
   | any important information in the logs MUST be summarized and forwarded
   | to the mailing list (along with, but not substituted by, a pointer to
   | the IRC logs and/or a pasted snippet) by the people involved in that
   | discussion so that no one needs to track the IRC logs to keep up with
   | the group.

please summarize the results of the discussion here--and paste a snippet
of the IRC log since we don't have a logger on IRC yet.



Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2008 02:15:32 UTC