- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:47:29 +0200
- To: "Alan Gresley" <alan@css-class.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:42:24 +0200, Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com> wrote: > For the cases where images are disabled or with a 404 error wouldn't > > background: url(image.png); > > do the same? No it would not. > Why have the red background in the first place? As fallback. > What actually happens when the image format is not supported? The fallback color would be used (per the proposal). > Would the result be similar to what happens with IE6 and transparent png > that shows a silver background? No idea. > I have forgotten to ask this previously. What is Issue-5? It's a reference to the issue tracker the CSS WG uses: http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/ -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 15:48:06 UTC