Re: Proposal for current Link Pseudo-class

Jason CranfordTeague wrote:

>> Except that the path component count is novel, this gets proposed at 
>> regular intervals.
> If it get proposed regularly, then that indicates a strong need for 
> something like this.

It's not proposed regularly under this exact form. The way you introduce
'level' matching is new or was so rarely suggested I don't remember it.


Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2007 06:21:56 UTC