W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2007

Re: W3C CSS Home Redesign RFC

From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:11:29 +0200
Message-ID: <010d01c82c05$5b782c00$0500000a@DOCENDO>
To: <www-style@w3.org>

Paul Nelson (ATC) wrote:

> Calibri is available only on Vista.

Not correct. I'm currently using it on XP.

> However, it could be made into an
> .EOT at the root of W3C's site (e.g. http://www.w3.org) and work
> well...if other than Microsoft will implement .EOT support.

Oink oink flap flap.

There's no point in even mentioning .EOT in discussions on practical web 
design these days; .EOT is useful for trivial demonstrations only.

In practice, the prime question in font choices is: which specific 
fonts, among those with more than, say, 20% coverage do you choose, in 
which order do you put them,  and can you really be sure that each and 
every of them works reasonably for your pages? Having solved this, you 
_might_ consider and which less common fonts you might add before them.

Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2007 06:08:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:31 UTC