- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:00:17 -0500
- To: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Al Gilman wrote: > > > Currently, the CSS2.1 Last Call draft's Appendix A, states: > > This is insufficient from the point of view of those who benefit > from aural styling; this definition should contain even more > robust verbiage than is contained in Section 19 of CSS2: > ... > The Protocols & Formats working group proposes that the extant text in > the CSS2.1 Candidate Recommendation draft be amended as follows: Al, CSS2.1 is currently a Candidate Recommendation, not a Last Call Working Draft; furthermore Appendix A is only informative. Your proposed text doesn't seem to say anything different from what is there, it only adds more examples. I can suggest that the CSS3 Speech editor consider adding some more example text to the CSS3 Speech draft http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-speech/ but I'm not convinced that we need to make this change for CSS2.1. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 20 December 2007 19:00:34 UTC