- From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:05:44 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
Currently, the CSS2.1 Last Call draft's Appendix A, states: <q cite="http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-CSS21-20070719/aural.html#propdef-cue"> If a user agent cannot render an auditory icon (e.g., the user's environment does not permit it), we recommend that it produce an alternative cue. </q> This is insufficient from the point of view of those who benefit from aural styling; this definition should contain even more robust verbiage than is contained in Section 19 of CSS2: <q cite="http://www.w3.org/TR/css2/aural.html#cue-props"> If a user agent cannot render an auditory icon (e.g., the user's environment does not permit it), we recommend that it produce an alternative cue (e.g., popping up a warning, emitting a warning sound, etc.) </q> The Protocols & Formats working group proposes that the extant text in the CSS2.1 Candidate Recommendation draft be amended as follows: <q source="PFWG" cite="http://www.w3.org/2007/12/19-pf-minutes.html#item06"> If a user agent cannot render an auditory icon (e.g., the user's environment does not permit it or the user does not have access to a device with a sound card), we recommend that it produce an alternative cue (e.g., emitting a warning sound using the device's internal speaker or generating an accessible warning in accordance with the users' pre-configured operating system settings (for example, if "Show Sounds" or the equivalent is enabled at the Operating System level, use the designated alternative mechanism for that OS to provide an accessible warning). </q> Thank you. Al /chair, PFWG
Received on Thursday, 20 December 2007 18:06:04 UTC