Re: Unit omission with zero length

Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> Next thing you'll have to find out is whether properties that do not
> allow negative lenghts allow -0. I know I raised this some time ago,
> but don't remember what the conclusion was (nor does this text say...)

“-0 is equivalent to 0 and is not a negative number.” [1]


— Patrick Garies

Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2007 09:07:52 UTC