Re: Unit omission with zero length

On Tuesday 04 December 2007 07:46, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

> Next thing you'll have to find out is whether properties that do not
> allow negative lenghts allow -0. I know I raised this some time ago,
> but don't remember what the conclusion was (nor does this text
> say...)

We added a line to section 4.3.1: "-0 is equivalent to 0 and is not a 
negative number."

http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-CSS21-20070719/syndata.html#numbers



Bert
-- 
  Bert Bos                                ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
  http://www.w3.org/people/bos                               W3C/ERCIM
  bert@w3.org                             2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
  +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92            06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France

Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2007 16:38:44 UTC