- From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:49:26 +0200
- To: www-style CSS <www-style@w3.org>
fantasai:
> Fuzzy Matching
I just proposed keywords (and floats) for this. Specified inexact
matches are the more universal approach, though.
> * For 'min-aspect-ratio' and 'max-aspect-ratio', if the actual
> aspect ratio is between 1/12 and 12/1 then the UA may round
> the actual aspect ratio to the nearest of:
What is the reason for choosing 12? Pretty much every aspect ratio
ever used in practice lies between 0.08(3) and 12, unless I'm missing
something.
> * the nominal ratio of any paper size listed in tables 3-8
> of [PWGMSN] in either portrait or landscape orientation
> * any ratio {1..(2N-1)}/N where N ∈ {1..12}[1]
> * the inverse of the above
Portrait already is the inverse of landscape.
> - Changing 5% to some other %
I heard rumours, which might well be wrong, that EICTA chose a 7%
margin for the requirements of their HD Ready logo to allow 17:9 and
15:9 display of 16:9 data. In my opinion, that is too fuzzy a match;
perhaps even 5% is too much.
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2007 21:50:13 UTC