- From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
- Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 23:31:53 +0200
- To: www-style CSS <www-style@w3.org>
Håkon Wium Lie: > It's not too late, but we don't have a better name. "Advanced > functionality for paged media" might be more suitable, CSS 3.5: Paged Media (Maybe you could also find some acronymic phrase matching PAGE, PRINT or PAPER.) > but what do we call the next version which has ever more > functionality? CSS 4: Paged Media ... Btw., which is the canonical variant? - CSS3 module: Foo - CSS 3 module: Foo - CSS3 Module: Foo - CSS 3 Module: Foo - CSS3: Foo - CSS 3: Foo The GCPM draft uses the first, the Paged Media draft the third style. > In general, advanced functionality has been moved from other specs > into gcpm. That makes it slightly more cumbersome to read up (two > documents instead of one), but it's more satisfying for implementors > can claim full compliance with a spec rather than, say, 2/3. > I thought we had levels (and profiles (and revisions)) for that. > HAekon Wium Lie CTO A0~eA.* Something went wrong here.
Received on Sunday, 5 August 2007 21:32:03 UTC