- From: Grant, Melinda <melinda.grant@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 01:51:28 -0000
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <78A3602ADF54BA4EAB53F378BF55588B01899031@G3W0067.americas.hpqcorp.net>
CSS3 Paged Media is a bit vague on details regarding counters used within page margins. I propose the addition of the following text to the section entitled "Page-based Extensions to Counters": " A 'counter-increment' within either a page or margin context causes the counter to increment with the generation of each page box. If a counter is reset or incremented within the page context, it is in scope for all margin boxes and obscures all counters of the same name within the document. If a counter is reset or incremented within a margin context, it is in scope for that margin box and obscures any counters of the same name in both the page context and the document. If a counter that has not been reset or incremented within the margin context or the page context is used by counter() or counters() in the margin context, then the resultant value is exactly as if the margin box were an element within the document at the start of the page, inside the deepest element in the normal flow that spans the page break. Use of the counter in this way does not affect the calculation of the counter's value. In the absence of a 'counter-reset' or 'counter-increment' for a counter named 'page', the UA must automatically create and increment such a counter as if "@page { counter-increment: page;}" were specified. In all other respects, page-associated counters behave as described in [[CSS21]], Nested Counters and Scope and Counters. " I think this should resolve the questions discussed in [1], [2], and [3] below, wrt css3-page. Thoughts / questions or concerns? Best wishes, Melinda [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007May/0074.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007May/0076.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Jun/0119.html Melinda S. Grant Connectivity Strategist Imaging & Printing Group
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2007 01:52:56 UTC